“Double Reduction” and Education Equality in the Context of Globalization
Keywords:
Double reduction, Education equality, GlobalizationAbstract
To adapt to the continuous development and changes, all countries in the world have carried out educational reforms based on the original educational policies. China has implemented the “Double Reduction” to better adapt to the development of globalization. This paper demonstrates the purpose and effect of the implementation of Double Reduction in China and discusses the impact of its implementation. This paper also gives reasonable suggestions for maximizing educational equality. It also points out that globalization can help the development of the education system in developing countries to some extent. Only by facing globalization and carrying out education reform can China promote education equity.
References
Hamdi FM, 2013, The Impact of Globalization in the Developing Countries. Developing Country Studies, 3(11): 142–144.
Quainoo EA, Aggrey R, Aggrey D, et al., 2022, The Impact of Globalization on Education: A Blessing or a Curse. Education Journal, 11(2): 70–74.
Burbules NC, Torres CA, 2000, Globalization and Education: Critical Perspectives. Routledge, New York.
Chinnammai S, 2005, Effects of Globalization on Education and Culture. ICDE International Conference, New Delhi, 2005: 1–6.
Rizvi F, Engel L, Ruthkowski D, et al., 2007, Equality and the Politics of Globalization in Education. International Perspectives on Educational Diversity and Inclusion. Studies from America, Europe, and India, 2007: 3–20.
Tang A, Tang R, 2008, Discussion about the Public Welfare of Education. Fudan Education Forum, 2008(1): 14–18.
Schleicher A, 2019, PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing.
Li J, Li X, Shi A, 2022, The Impact of the Double Reduction Policy. 2021 International Conference on Education, Language, and Art (ICELA 2021), 2022: 713–720. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220131.131
Ilon L, 2011, Can Education Equality Trickle-Down to Economic Growth? The Case of Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4): 653–663.
Sima Y, 2015, A Study on Education Problems of Left-behind Children in Rural Areas from the Viewpoint of Educational Equality. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Social Science Edition), 17(4): 64–69.
Chu H, 2020, What Kind of Educational Equity We Need in the New Era—Consummating the Domain of Research Questions and the Policy Toolbox of Educational Equity. Educational Research, 41(02): 4–16.
Liang Z, 2011, Research on the Balanced Allocation of Teachers in Compulsory Education, thesis, Guangxi Minzu University.
Wen M, 2006, Does Globalization Improve or Undermine Education Equity? Journal of Educational Studies, 2(5): 58–70.
Zhang M, 2005, The Error Analysis of College Entrance Examination Fairness. Hubei Recruitment Exam for Enrolled Students, 2005(20): 24–28.
Luo Y, 2022, The Response of Chinese Private Education Organizations to the “Double Reduction” Policy: Evidence from New Oriental and TAL. 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022), 2022: 1388–1392.
Shen JJ, Cheah CS, Leung CY, 2020, The Long-Term Socialization Goals of Chinese and Korean Immigrant Mothers in the United States. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(6): 1771–1779.
Li R, 2016, Shadow Education in China: What is the Relationship Between Private Tutoring and Students’ National College Entrance Examination Performance? thesis, Iowa State University.
Lee JH, 2004, The School Equalization Policy of Korea: Past Failures and Proposed Measure for Reform. Korea Journal, 44(1): 221–234.
Barber M, Mourshed M, 2007, How the World’s Best-Performing Schools Systems Come Out on Top. McKinsey and Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/how-the-worlds-best-performing-school-systems-come-out-on-top
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2017, PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
